Dan ReinischLEARNING DESIGN PORTFOLIO

SELECTED LEARNING DESIGN

Make the next
step clear.

I design interactive lessons that make complex ideas easier to understand and give learners meaningful opportunities to apply what they’ve learned.

Explore selected work

Three examples. A clear view of the instruction, practice, and design decisions.

THE DESIGN THREAD

Clear goals

Visible reasoning

Useful feedback

Fresh application

01 / SELECTED WORK

Experience the learning.
See the thinking behind it.

Explore applied writing, a focused literature lesson, and a job-application task. Each opens on Reinisch Classroom in a new tab.

01 / LANGUAGE ARTS LEARNING STUDIO

THE PRACTICAL WRITING TASK

What changed?
What happens next?

The change
The meeting moves to Room 12.

The fact to preserve
It still starts at 3 p.m.

The next action
Update the signs by 2:45 p.m.

A new situation for the learner’s own message.

FEATURED EXPERIENCE / APPLIED WRITING

Language Arts
Learning Studio

Suggested starting point: Write a Clear Message

A useful update gives the reader accurate information and a clear next step. This course builds one message through short lessons, contrasting examples, and feedback before asking the learner to write about a new situation.

Learning goal
Write a short, accurate message that explains a change and gives a teammate a clear next step.
Audience & format
Older students developing practical writing skills · Five short lessons, guided checks, and a written application.
Try Write a Clear Message (opens in a new tab) Explore the Language Arts Studio (opens in a new tab)

What to try

  1. Inspect the worked example (opens in a new tab)See how the lesson preserves facts and uncertainty.
  2. Try the feedback (opens in a new tab)Choose an answer, read the explanation, and reconsider.
  3. Write a fresh update (opens in a new tab)Draft a response before opening the model.
Inside the design Language Arts Learning Studio

The learning need

Learners need to choose relevant facts, organize a message, and make a usable request. The course connects those decisions to a task with a clear reader and purpose.

Why it is structured this way

A delayed supply delivery stays consistent across the worked lessons. Contrasting examples make errors visible, and response-specific feedback explains how to improve a choice. The final room-change task asks learners to use the method with new facts.

Support and evidence

An optional planner, self-checks, and a model response support revision. The five-question check and written response are separate. Writing is self-reviewed; a completed check does not establish writing proficiency.

02 / A SELECTED LESSON FROM 1984

THE REASONING TO PRACTICE

From an object
to a possible meaning.

  1. Notice the detail.

    What is present in the scene?

  2. Consider the context.

    What makes the detail matter here?

  3. Support an interpretation.

    Which details make that meaning plausible?

An interpretation needs a connection to the evidence.

FEATURED LESSON / SYMBOLISM

1984: From objects
to meaning

Module 4 · Day 3 / Symbolism and recurring details

This sequence helps learners explain what an object may represent. An original worked example introduces the reasoning before learners examine the paperweight in 1984, answer guided questions, and apply the method to a new fictional scenario.

Learning goal
Explain one plausible symbolic meaning and support it with two relevant details from a supplied scenario.
Audience & format
Students learning literary analysis · A guided lesson with modeling, feedback, and a fresh interpretation task.
Try the symbolism lesson (opens in a new tab)

For this portfolio review: follow Steps 1–9, ending at “Use the skill beyond this book.” The examples provide the context you need. Step 10 is a classroom extension requiring Part One, Chapter VIII of the novel.

What to try

  1. Follow the original modelSee how an empty-chair example connects a detail to meaning.
  2. Test an interpretationUse the supplied paperweight context and guided feedback.
  3. Transfer the methodInterpret the original map scenario before revealing the comparison.
Inside the design Teaching symbolism

The learning need

Recognizing an object is a starting point. Learners also need a method for explaining its possible meaning and connecting that interpretation to details in the text.

Why it is structured this way

The sequence separates an object’s literal role from its possible meaning. An original example introduces the method, brief novel context supports guided analysis, and a fresh map scenario asks learners to generate their own explanation.

Support and evidence

Guided questions explain why an interpretation fits the details. The transfer task asks for a meaning supported by two clues, followed by a reasoning comparison. Independent application to the novel requires the assigned reading.

03 / PRACTICAL JOB READINESS

THE APPLICATION TASK

Use the facts.
Check the fit.

Contact details
Copy the fictional applicant’s information.

Availability
Match the days and times to the source card.

Final review
Find and repair the mismatches.

An editable application, with supplied facts and specific feedback.

FEATURED ACTIVITY / JOB APPLICATIONS

Complete an application
with accurate details

From Complete a Form Accurately in Transitional Skills

Application forms ask learners to connect information across several sections. This activity moves through contact details, availability, education and experience, references, and a final review. Fictional applicant cards provide the facts; targeted feedback helps learners find and correct mismatches.

Learning goal
Use supplied applicant information to complete and check an application, then repair errors in a different applicant’s draft.
Audience & format
Students preparing for work · Five small sections, a guided case, and a second draft to repair.
Try the application practice (opens in a new tab)

What to try

  1. Complete Casey’s guided caseUse the relevant source facts to fill each small section.
  2. Inspect the feedbackTry a plausible mismatch, check the explanation, and correct it.
  3. Repair Ari’s draftUse changed facts to find errors in availability, experience, and references.
Inside the design Job-application practice

The learning need

Recognizing a correct form field does not show whether a learner can assemble an accurate application. The activity connects several sections in one editable task and requires a review of the whole draft.

Why it is structured this way

Casey’s guided case provides a worked model and section-specific facts. Ari’s draft changes the facts and section order, with realistic errors to repair. A later edit invalidates the earlier review so the learner must check the current draft.

Support and evidence

Source cards, hints, read-aloud, and blank printable practice support access. First checks, later corrections, and hint use remain distinct. Ari’s task assesses repair of a supplied draft, not independent completion of a blank form; adult prompting is not measured.

These samples show working instruction, feedback, and application tasks. Measured learning gains have not been established. The 1984 lesson is an independent teaching resource; George Orwell’s novel remains the source for the classroom reading extension.

02 / MY APPROACH

Understanding comes first.

I build a path from a clear purpose to a task the learner can attempt independently.

01

Give the skill a purpose.

I introduce a realistic situation or a question worth answering. The learning goal describes what the learner will do, and the examples show why the skill matters.

02

Make the thinking visible.

I explain the reasoning in manageable steps. Worked examples, comparisons, and targeted feedback help learners understand how an answer or decision is supported.

03

Build toward application.

I provide a fresh task after guided practice. Learners can use optional supports, review their response, and revise it against clear criteria.

03 / ABOUT THE DESIGNER

Classroom experience.
A practical design lens.

I’m Dan Reinisch, a high school special education teacher focused on English language arts and life skills. My classroom work shapes how I explain difficult ideas, anticipate where learners may get stuck, and make support easy to use.

I led the instructional design and review of these Reinisch Classroom experiences, using AI to support development and implementation. The portfolio focuses on the learning goals, content decisions, feedback, and opportunities to apply a skill.

The examples shown here use fictional practice situations. No student records or submitted student work are included in this portfolio.